Dog Bite Laws By State: Understanding The Differences (2026)
- Understanding Dog Bite Liability: Strict Liability vs. One-Bite Rule
- State-by-State Dog Bite Laws
- How Strict Liability Laws Protect Dog Bite Victims
- When Dog Owners Avoid Liability: Common Exceptions
- Local Leash Laws and Their Impact on Dog Bite Cases
- What Damages Can You Recover After a Dog Bite?
- Filing a Dog Bite Claim: Time Limits and Legal Process
- Get Legal Help: Connect With a Dog Bite Attorney
Summary
- Most states have strict liability or one-bite rules for dog bites
- Leash laws can play a role in a dog bite case, too
Every year in the United States, approximately 334,000 people are admitted into emergency departments for dog bite-related injuries. One of the legal options available in these instances could be a personal injury claim, but be aware that there are various dog bite laws by state.
If you have suffered injuries, whether minor or catastrophic, as a result of a dog attack, knowing what to expect from the legal process, depending on where you live, is essential. Learn more about your legal options and why having a personal injury lawyer makes a significant difference.
Free Personal Injury Case Review
Preparing Case Review Form. ConsumerShield is transforming the way consumers experience law.
Understanding Dog Bite Liability: Strict Liability vs. One-Bite Rule
Dog bite laws vary by state but tend to fall into two main types. These are strict liability and the one-bite rule. Strict liability holds dog owners responsible for the injuries their animals cause, regardless of whether they displayed any type of negligence.
The one-bite rule, on the other hand, requires establishing that the dog’s owner knew or should have known the animal was dangerous because it had attacked someone before, and they failed to prevent another bite.
State-by-State Dog Bite Laws
Understanding dog bite laws by state can help you better prepare when filing a claim.
| State | Liability Type | What Owners Pay For | Main Defense |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Strict Liability | Unprovoked attacks on owner's property (lawful visitors) | Owner had no knowledge of dog's aggression |
| Alaska | Negligence Standard | Only if owner was negligent in control/care | General negligence standards apply |
| Arizona | Strict Liability | Public property bites + lawful private property visits | Victim provoked the dog |
| Arkansas | Negligence/Knowledge | If owner knew of dangerous tendencies OR negligent | Owner unaware of dog's dangerous behavior |
| California | Strict Liability | Unprovoked attacks (public/lawful private visits) | Police dogs are exempt |
| Colorado | Mixed Rule | One-bite rule generally; strict liability for serious injuries | Provocation, trespass, or "Beware of Dog" sign posted |
| Connecticut | Strict Liability | All attacks unless victim trespassed (children under 7 presumed lawful), abused dog, committed crime, or police dogs | Victim trespassed, abused dog, or was committing crime |
| Delaware | Strict Liability | All attacks unless victim trespassed or abused dog | Police dogs and protection animals exempt |
| Florida | Strict Liability | All unprovoked attacks (with comparative fault consideration) | Victim trespassed, abused dog, or committed crime; "Bad Dog" sign posted |
| Georgia | Strict Liability | Dangerous animals or off-leash/out-of-control dogs | Victim must prove dog's dangerous propensities |
| Hawaii | Strict Liability | When owner proven negligent | Victim trespassing or animal abuse |
| Idaho | One-Bite Rule | Only after first incident if owner knew of danger | Trespassing, animal abuse, criminal acts, hunting interference |
| Illinois | Strict Liability | All bites and attacks | Victim trespassed or provoked dog |
| Indiana | Mixed Standard | Strict liability for postal/government workers; negligence for others | Victim trespassed or provoked dog |
| Iowa | Strict Liability | All bites and injuries | Illegal acts by victim and some rabies cases |
| Kansas | One-Bite Rule | Only if owner negligent after knowing of danger | General negligence principles apply |
| Kentucky | Strict Liability | People, livestock, and property damage | No major statutory exceptions |
| Louisiana | Strict Liability | If owner could have prevented bite | Victim provoked the dog |
| Maine | Strict Liability | Bites occurring on owner's property | Victim must show lack of owner fault |
| Maryland | Strict Liability | At-large dogs (off-leash in public) | Provocation, trespassing, or animal abuse |
| Massachusetts | Strict Liability | Unprovoked attacks; children under 7 presumed not trespassing | Provocation or trespassing |
| Michigan | Strict Liability | Public property and lawful private property visits | Provocation or trespassing |
| Minnesota | Strict Liability | Public places and lawfully on private property | Provocation or trespassing |
| Mississippi | One-Bite Rule | If owner knew of dog's dangerous propensities | Owner unaware of dangerous behavior |
| Missouri | Strict Liability | Unprovoked attacks (public or lawful private); $1,000 fine possible | Courts may reduce damages for victim fault |
| Montana | Strict Liability | In incorporated cities and towns | No major statutory exceptions |
| Nebraska | Strict Liability | All bites and injuries | Playful dogs and trespassers exempt |
| Nevada | Negligence Standard | When owner negligent; may face felony charges for vicious bites | General negligence rules apply |
| New Hampshire | Strict Liability | All injuries caused by dogs | Trespassing or other criminal acts by victim |
| New Jersey | Strict Liability | Public property and lawfully on private property | No major statutory exceptions |
| New Mexico | Strict Liability | If owner knew of dog's dangerous propensities | Owner unaware of dangerous behavior |
| New York | Strict Liability | Dangerous dogs with exceptions for human defense | Victim must prove negligence for non-physical damages |
| North Carolina | Strict Liability | At-large and known dangerous dogs | Victim may also sue for negligence |
| North Dakota | Strict Liability | Under negligence rules | General negligence standards apply |
| Ohio | Strict Liability | Injuries from dog's behavior | Trespassing, criminal acts, or provocation |
| Oklahoma | Strict Liability | Unprovoked attacks (public or lawful private property) | No major statutory exceptions |
| Oregon | Strict Liability | Dogs with known dangerous tendencies | Provocation may reduce damages |
| Pennsylvania | Mixed Rule | One-bite rule generally; strict liability for severe unprovoked injuries | Victim provoked or contributed to injury |
| Rhode Island | Strict Liability | Unprovoked injuries from unconfined dogs to lawful visitors | Dog confined on owner's property is exempt |
| South Carolina | Strict Liability | Public property or lawful private property visits | No major statutory exceptions |
| South Dakota | Strict Liability | All injuries; especially if owner knew of dangerous behavior | General negligence standards apply |
| Tennessee | Strict Liability | All pet-caused injuries regardless of prior behavior | Trespassers or those causing harm to others exempt |
| Texas | Strict Liability | All unprovoked bites/attacks to lawful visitors | Victim can claim for leash violations and negligence too |
| Utah | Strict Liability | All dog injuries regardless of prior behavior | Police/government animals exempt from liability |
| Vermont | Strict Liability | When victim proves owner knew dog was dangerous | Owner had no knowledge of dangerous propensities |
| Virginia | Negligence Standard | When owner had knowledge of dog's dangerous behavior | Trespassers, intruders, provocation, animal abuse exempt |
| Washington | Strict Liability | Unprovoked attacks (public/lawful private visits) | Law enforcement animals exempt |
| West Virginia | Strict Liability | If dog had at-large status during attack/bite | Dog controlled/confined at time of incident |
| Wisconsin | One-Bite Rule + Penalty | $50-$2,500 fine for first offense; second offense doubles damages | Specific statutory penalty structure applies |
| Wyoming | Strict Liability | If victim proves negligence or owner knowledge of violence | Comparative fault may assign shared liability |
| Washington, D.C. | Strict Liability | At-large dogs off-leash in public spaces | Victim's contributory negligence may reduce award |
Free Personal Injury Case Review
Preparing Case Review Form. ConsumerShield is transforming the way consumers experience law.
How Strict Liability Laws Protect Dog Bite Victims
Many states have adopted strict liability laws for dog bites because of how they can assist victims. In these cases, you don’t have to demonstrate that the owner was negligent, making the evidence-gathering process a bit easier.
Instead of focusing on whether the dog owner knew that their animal was dangerous, strict liability cases mainly look at the types of damages the victim could be entitled to depending on the extent of their injuries. It offers a clearer and faster path to compensation.
When Dog Owners Avoid Liability: Common Exceptions
There are some exceptions that dog bite laws allow for, both in strict liability and one-bite rule instances. One of these exceptions is if the victim provoked the animal. If you were teasing or otherwise bothering the dog, any resulting injuries could be seen as partly or fully your fault.
Another exception would be if you were trespassing at the time of the attack. The owner will likely not be held responsible for injuries you sustain if you were not on the property legally.
The owners of police or military dogs are usually exempt from any type of liability if the bite occurred when the animal was performing its official duties. That could mean while chasing an individual, trying to apprehend them or participating in an investigation.
Some jurisdictions also make exceptions for other types of working dogs. If they were herding, hunting or performing predator control services on the owner’s property when the bite occurred, the owner may be exempt from liability.
Some individuals are seen as having full knowledge of their risk of being bitten. Veterinarians and dog groomers are two examples. If a dog bites them, the animal’s owner would likely not be liable.
Free Personal Injury Case Review
Preparing Case Review Form. ConsumerShield is transforming the way consumers experience law.
Local Leash Laws and Their Impact on Dog Bite Cases
Local leash laws have a significant impact on dog bite lawsuits. In many jurisdictions, breaking a leash law could make an owner responsible for breaking a safety statute. This would make them immediately liable for any resulting injuries.
Breaking leash laws can make it easier for victims to prove the owner was negligent and breached their duty of care toward other members of the public. This makes it easier to prove fault.
What Damages Can You Recover After a Dog Bite?
After sustaining a dog bite, you can recover economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages address tangible losses, beginning with medical expenses. If the injuries were significant, you can receive compensation for future care you may need as well.
Economic damages also address lost wages if you have to miss work as you recover. In instances when you can’t return to work in the same capacity, you could also receive compensation for your loss of earning potential.
Non-economic damages address losses that don’t come with clear price tags. You can receive coverage for your physical and emotional suffering, as well as your loss of enjoyment of life, if the injuries prevent you from living as you used to.
Free Personal Injury Case Review
Preparing Case Review Form. ConsumerShield is transforming the way consumers experience law.
Filing a Dog Bite Claim: Time Limits and Legal Process
Beginning a dog bite claim is a complex process, and it’s not one you should delay. There are statutes of limitations you must abide by. These are timelines that dictate how long you have to file a claim. Just like other dog bite laws by state, each jurisdiction has its own statute of limitations.
To begin the legal process of holding a dog’s owner responsible, you will need to file a claim with the help of an attorney. They will gather evidence to demonstrate that you deserve compensation for your losses and calculate the damages you may be entitled to.
Negotiations with insurance companies come next. The purpose of these is to reach a fair settlement.
Get Legal Help: Connect With a Dog Bite Attorney
If you have sustained an injury because of a dog bite, you may have to pursue a personal injury claim. To have a chance to recover your full losses, you need an attorney by your side. At ConsumerShield, we can assist you in connecting with a local lawyer. Contact our team to get started.
Free Personal Injury Case Review
Preparing Case Review Form. ConsumerShield is transforming the way consumers experience law.
Personal Injury Knowledge Base
Read the latest information on Personal Injury and find answers to your questions. Currently there are 54 topics about Personal Injury Claims.
-
Property Damage
-
Sue Emotional Distress
-
Wrongful Death Attorney
-
Birth Injury Lawyer
-
Dog Bite Lawsuit
-
Intentional Tort
-
Wrongful Death Lawsuit
-
Reasonable Person
-
Proximate Cause
-
Contributory Negligence
-
can-you-sue-government
-
Negligence Examples
-
Strict Liability Tort
-
Vicarious Liability
-
Tort Liability
-
Tort Reform
-
Respondeat Superior
-
Settlements & Payouts
-
Settlement Examples
-
Pain&Suffering Lawyer
-
Economic Damages
-
Corporal Injury Spouse
-
Meaning and Purpose
-
Elder Attorneys
-
Pain And Suffering
-
Personal Injury Law
-
False Allegations
-
Slander vs Libel
-
Defamation Lawsuit
-
Defamation Per Se
-
Personal Injury
-
Structured Settlement
-
Lawyer Took Settlement
-
Are Settlements Taxable
-
Malicious Prosecution
-
Tolling Agreement
-
Statutes Of Limitations
Statutes Of Limitations For Civil Sexual Assault Cases By State
-
Sexual Abuse Lawsuits
-
Statute Of Limitations
-
Cases Lawyers Handle
-
Defamation of Character
-
nominal-damages
-
Reasons To Complaint
-
Sue For Slander
-
Breach Of Duty
-
Pain & Suffering
-
Elements Of Negligence
-
General vs Special
Frequently Asked Questions
-
Most dog bite claims are settled out of court. If there are disputes that make a settlement impossible, it may be necessary to take the case to trial.
-
The severity of the injuries, the amount of evidence and its quality and whether you hold some fault in the incident will all impact how much your case is worth.